You can file a U.S. trademark application by yourself, this afternoon, from a laptop, for the price of a government fee. Nobody will stop you. The USPTO's system will happily accept your application, take your money, and give you a filing receipt that feels a lot like progress.
Whether that's a good idea depends entirely on a question the application itself will never ask you: do you know what you don't know?
Here's the direct answer. If you're based in the U.S., you are not legally required to hire an attorney to file a federal trademark application. Foreign-domiciled applicants are a different story — since August 2019, USPTO rule has required anyone domiciled outside the U.S. or its territories to be represented by a U.S.-licensed attorney. If you're a U.S. resident or a U.S.-headquartered business, the door is open. Being allowed through it and it being the smart move are not the same claim.
The USPTO's online system, TEAS, is a form. It is not a judgment engine. It will not tell you your goods-and-services description is too broad, too narrow, or drafted in a way that invites an Office Action. It will not run a clearance search for confusingly similar marks — including the much larger universe of unregistered, common-law marks that never show up in the federal database at all. It will not notice that your "distinctive" brand name is, in the eyes of a USPTO examining attorney, merely descriptive of what you sell.
It will, however, cash your check. As of the January 2025 fee restructuring, that's a base of $350 per class of goods or services — non-refundable if the application is refused, abandoned, or opposed. The government fee doesn't buy you a working trademark. It buys you a place in line to find out if you have one.
Self-filed applications get refused and challenged more often than attorney-filed ones — not because the USPTO is biased against solo filers, but because the mistakes that sink applications are exactly the ones a first-time filer doesn't know to look for. A weak specimen. A classification that doesn't match actual use. A mark that's confusingly similar to something already registered, or in active common-law use, that a two-minute Google search wouldn't have surfaced.
Then there's the deadline problem. If the USPTO issues an Office Action — and it's common enough that you should plan for it, not hope around it — you get a window to respond, typically three months, extendable to six. Miss it, and the application is abandoned. Not paused. Not put on hold. Abandoned, filing fee and all, and you start over from zero having paid full price for the education.
This isn't a scare piece. Self-filing is a legitimate choice under a specific set of conditions: your mark is highly distinctive (invented words beat descriptive ones every time), you've done your own reasonably thorough search and found nothing close, you're comfortable reading formal legal notices carefully and responding to them on a government clock, and you're optimizing for a lower number today over saved time and reduced risk later. That's a real trade-off some founders should take. It's just a trade-off, not a free lunch.
The math most founders skip: compare the attorney's fee against the cost of doing it twice. A rejected DIY application doesn't just cost the original filing fee — it costs the months of pendency, the legal exposure of having used an unprotected name in the meantime, and often a rebrand you didn't plan for. Run that number before you decide the cheaper option is actually cheaper.
Will the USPTO reject my application if I file it myself?
Not automatically — but self-filed applications are refused or challenged more often, typically due to classification errors, weak specimens, or conflicting marks the applicant didn't know to search for.
Can I hire an attorney after I've already started filing myself?
Yes. An attorney can take over mid-process, including responding to an Office Action on an application you filed yourself — though it's usually more efficient, and sometimes cheaper overall, to bring one in before filing rather than after.
Is it true that foreign applicants must use a U.S. attorney?
Yes. Since August 2019, USPTO rule has required foreign-domiciled applicants and registrants to be represented by an attorney licensed to practice law in the United States.
Is trademark registration actually worth it for a small business?
For most businesses building a name they intend to keep, yes — federal registration provides nationwide legal presumption of ownership, the right to use the ® symbol, and standing to enforce the mark against later, confusingly similar users. Whether it's worth doing yourself or through an attorney depends on the factors above.
Related reading: how to choose a trademark attorney · what a trademark attorney actually costs trademark attorney vs. LegalZoom, compared